Xcitium offering
Continuous validation of security controls. System configurations and controls can be assessed against frameworks such as NIST, CIS, ISO 27002, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS and GDPR.
Discuss your requirements ↗
Continuous compliance management
Map systems to selected frameworks, keep checking policies and configurations, record changes with evidence, and validate controls again after remediation.
Infrastructure, applications, identities, and cloud services are mapped to applicable controls. The organization selects the standards and requirements relevant to its operations, such as NIST, CIS, ISO 27002, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR.
Workflow result: A control set mapped to in-scope assets
Configuration and policy state is evaluated against requirements to surface drift and compliance gaps.
Workflow result: Current control status and detected drift
Configuration snapshots, system logs, and compliance data are collected as audit evidence. Workflows can direct configuration, policy, and patch remediation.
Workflow result: Evidence record and tracked remediation
After remediation, control status is evaluated again. Dashboards and reports show remaining gaps and the evidence collected.
Workflow result: Updated control view and audit report
Workflow result
Security and compliance teams can follow drift, action, and evidence in one control cycle without relying only on periodic manual reviews.
Capabilities
CTEM continuously maps policies, configurations and controls to frameworks including NIST, CIS, ISO 27002, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS and GDPR.
Discover assets, applications, identities and cloud services; monitor configuration drift and route remediation workflows.
Configuration snapshots, system logs, compliance data and dashboards support evidence collection for auditors and leadership.
The organization determines applicable legal requirements and controls. The platform supports tracking and reporting.
Compare approaches
| Consideration | Continuous compliance management | Continuous vulnerability management |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Control status against selected requirements. | Rank technical vulnerabilities by CVE, asset and exploit likelihood. |
| Workflow | Check configurations, record drift and recheck remediation. | Threat-informed vulnerability prioritization and remediation work. |
| Output and handoff | Traceable audit evidence and outstanding control gaps. | Risk-ranked vulnerabilities and remediation tasks. |
Before you start
Agree the framework and version, system boundaries, agent/cloud connections, evidence owners and remediation actions requiring approval.
Which framework, version and organizational unit are in scope?
Which infrastructure, identity and application sources are available?
Which changes need approval before automated remediation?
In practice
During audit preparation, configurations change and control evidence sits across teams. Continuous compliance management helps track drift, collect evidence and coordinate remediation between review cycles.
What your team gains
Visibility into control drift
Organized audit evidence
Remediation tracking
Before you decide
CTEM continuously evaluates system configurations and security controls against selected frameworks.
Configuration snapshots, system logs and compliance data support audit reporting.
No. The tool helps track controls and evidence; it does not determine legal obligations or certify compliance.
Next step
Tell us about your environment and priorities to discuss the right solution, pilot scope and rollout in Azerbaijan.
