Xcitium offering
Prioritizing vulnerabilities by asset and exploit likelihood. CTEM synchronizes CVE/NVD data and uses EPSS exploit probability to prioritize vulnerabilities.
Discuss your requirements ↗
Continuous vulnerability management
Correlate asset vulnerabilities with threat intelligence, prioritize by exploitation likelihood, remediate under policy, and validate the outcome with a rescan linked to the CVE.
Build visibility across internal infrastructure, internet-facing services, identities, applications, and cloud services; correlate new vulnerability intelligence with assets.
Operational result: Asset and vulnerability inventory
Enrich findings with CVE/NVD intelligence and rank them using EPSS exploitation probability so teams can focus on more actionable risk.
Operational result: Prioritized risk queue
Patch coverage includes operating systems and more than 600 third-party applications. Deploy patches through policy-driven workflows and use recommended actions where appropriate.
Operational result: Completed remediation linked to the CVE
The asset is checked again after remediation. Reports show remaining findings, risk posture, and remediation progress.
Operational result: Validated status and progress report
Operational result
Security and infrastructure teams can follow a finding from scan through priority selection to confirmation that remediation took effect.
Capabilities
CTEM combines CVE/NVD data and EPSS exploit-likelihood scoring with asset context to prioritize exposure.
Synchronize asset and vulnerability signals; prioritize using exploit likelihood, asset importance and remediation need.
Route a current vulnerability ranking and remediation worklist to security and infrastructure owners.
EPSS is a likelihood estimate, not proof of exploitation; results depend on asset inventory, scan coverage and prioritization rules.
Compare approaches
| Consideration | Continuous vulnerability management | Vulnerability assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Continuous risk prioritization using asset context and EPSS. | Assessment and reporting for an agreed external attack surface, with recurring scanning available. |
| Workflow | Refresh intelligence, patch under policy and validate by CVE. | External scanning, risk grouping and agreed monthly reporting. |
| Output and handoff | Current risk queue and validated remediation progress. | Findings and remediation guidance for the assessment period. |
Before you start
Define the inventory source, agent and scan coverage, critical assets, and how remediation tasks reach owners.
What are the update cadence and coverage for CVE/NVD and EPSS?
How are critical assets mapped to business services?
Who owns risk acceptance, exceptions and remediation deadlines?
In practice
A security team struggles to decide which newly disclosed weaknesses matter across a large asset estate. Continuous vulnerability management helps prioritize exposure by asset and exploitation context.
What your team gains
Asset-aware risk priorities
Remediation work visibility
Tracking of unresolved vulnerabilities
Before you decide
CVE/NVD data, EPSS exploit likelihood and asset context inform prioritization.
EPSS estimates exploit likelihood; it does not confirm exploitation in a particular organization.
Route prioritized vulnerabilities and remediation tasks to security and infrastructure owners.
Next step
Tell us about your environment and priorities to discuss the right solution, pilot scope and rollout in Azerbaijan.
