The fund adopts a program
The fund makes the program part of its member risk-control services and sets the scope and participation model.
Result for the fund: A shared scope and control framework for members
Xcitium offering
US program for joint insurance funds and government risk pools. Developed in New Jersey, Xcitium’s program coordinates assessment, education and protective measures for joint insurance funds and government risk pools across the US.
Discuss your requirements ↗
Public entities and pooled risk programs
For US joint insurance funds and government risk pools, the program combines independent assessments of member cyber posture with baseline services and fund-wide reporting.
The fund makes the program part of its member risk-control services and sets the scope and participation model.
Result for the fund: A shared scope and control framework for members
Baseline services such as security awareness and external vulnerability scanning begin for each entity, bringing members with different resources into one program.
Result for the fund: Awareness education and vulnerability assessment
Independent assessment adds verified evidence to member self-reported checklists. Findings can be followed at member and fund level.
Result for the fund: Verified posture and areas requiring action
Administrators review the fund-wide view and documented controls. The materials support underwriting and renewal discussions.
Result for the fund: Fund reporting and renewal evidence
Result for the fund
Administrators work from one consolidated view instead of chasing member-by-member self-reports, while entities receive support through a shared risk program.
Capabilities
Developed in New Jersey, Xcitium’s program coordinates assessments, education and protective measures for US joint insurance funds (JIFs) and government risk pools (GRPs) nationwide.
Assess the participating entity’s environment and risks, then connect the assessment with education and relevant protective measures.
The coordinated outputs are an entity risk profile, education needs and prioritized protective actions.
The US program serves eligible joint insurance funds, government risk pools and their member entities.
Compare approaches
| Consideration | Cyber risk management for public sector | Information security gap assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Shared member-risk program for US funds. | Map documentation and control gaps against a selected framework. |
| Workflow | Coordinate baseline services and optional work. | Document review, interviews and evidence review. |
| Output and handoff | Member and fund-level reporting. | Prioritized gaps and remediation list. |
Before you start
For the US program, confirm fund and member eligibility and ownership of assessment versus protective actions. Organizations in Azerbaijan can discuss assessment and training services separately.
Which joint fund and program does the entity participate in?
Who delivers the assessment, training and protective actions?
What are the program’s geographic and eligibility terms?
In practice
A public entity or municipality wants a consistent way to assess member risks, provide education and coordinate protective measures across a joint insurance program.
What your team gains
Comparable view of participating entities’ risks
Prioritized education needs
Agreed protective actions and ownership
Before you decide
For members of eligible joint insurance funds and government risk pools across the US.
The program coordinates entity risk assessment, education and protective measures.
This program is for US funds and risk pools. Organizations in Azerbaijan can discuss assessment and training services separately.
Next step
Tell us about your environment and priorities to discuss the right solution, pilot scope and rollout in Azerbaijan.