Recon and map the environment
- Network topology
- Exposed assets
- Technology stack
Vulnerability map for testing
Xcitium offering
Testing agreed targets with realistic attack techniques. Testers look for exploitable weaknesses in networks, endpoints, applications or wireless infrastructure and document validated impact.
Discuss your requirements ↗
Authorized attack testing
Within written rules, testers examine network, endpoint, application or wireless targets and report the validated impact of exploitable weaknesses.
Approved rules of engagement
Confidential penetration test report
The system owner provides written authorization; targets and exclusions are listed, and the testing window, contacts and stop conditions are agreed. These rules establish the test boundary and the escalation path if an operational concern arises.
Approved rules of engagement
Testers examine network topology, exposed assets and technology signals across the agreed environment. Automated tools and manual analysis map potential weaknesses and build a focused basis for the next validation steps.
Vulnerability map for testing
The real impact of discovered weaknesses is checked using bounded methods within the approved targets. Testers assess possible access and privilege escalation while avoiding destructive actions and following the agreed stop conditions.
Findings with validated impact
A confidential report brings together risk ratings, attack narratives, potential impact and remediation actions for each finding. The customer uses it to prioritize fixes and can agree a retest where that work is within scope.
Confidential penetration test report
Testing stays within targets and rules approved in writing, and the report explains the impact that testers validated.
Capabilities
Testers look for exploitable weaknesses in networks, endpoints, applications or wireless infrastructure and document validated impact.
Rules, targets, testing windows and stop conditions are agreed in writing. The report records findings and technical remediation context.
Compare approaches
| Consideration | Penetration testing | Vulnerability assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Attack impact on authorized targets. | Scan a broader asset set for known vulnerabilities. |
| Workflow | Test under written engagement rules. | Authorized scanning and risk ranking. |
| Output and handoff | Validated results and secure report. | Vulnerability inventory and remediation guidance. |
Before you start
Obtain written owner authorization, separate production and staging targets, check third-party dependencies and name the contact for a test stop.
Which targets, methods and exclusions are authorized in writing?
What are the test window, monitoring and stop condition?
Who assigns technical remediation owners?
In practice
An organization wants to test network, endpoint, application or wireless infrastructure. Both parties document targets, permitted methods, test windows and stop conditions.
What your team gains
Validated attack paths and remediation context
Technical findings and validated impact
Context for remediation planning
Before you decide
The test examines agreed network, endpoint, application or wireless targets under written authorization and scope.
Rules of engagement define targets, permitted methods, the test window, contacts and stop conditions.
The report provides validated findings, impact context and technical remediation steps.
Next step
Tell us about your environment and priorities to discuss the right solution, pilot scope and rollout in Azerbaijan.